On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 09:14:00AM +0000, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote: > Casper Ti. Vector: > > > But I do think the capability argument has its validity: chainloading > > is, at this time, not well known to normal users, which is why many > > systemd supporters compulsorily identify cgroup support with systemd > > with few people opposing. Therefore I suggest to add some examples of > > capacility control (eg. one example for ulimit, plus one example for > > cgroup) into the comparison page, or an independent page. > > > Such "systemd supporters" don't actually know systemd. > > * http://jdebp.eu./FGA/linux-control-groups-are-not-jobs.html > > To anyone running the service manager and bundles from nosh version 1.28 or > later on Linux: You are encouraged to look at your control group hierarchy, > with a tool like "systemd-cgls /", with the "cgroup" field of the ps > command, or by simply listing your /sys/fs/cgroup/ hierarchy. You are in > for an interesting surprise.
I have ready your article, and understand it. Please be more detailed, I am interested, but due to not using systemd, I ahve nothing in /sys/fs/cgroup What is the interesting surprise, explained? Jean