El jue, 3 dic 2020 a las 18:34, Laurent Bercot escribió: > > So, can you juggle fds to avoid nosetsid, or can't you do the same > thing without it?
This particular use of nosetsid can probably be implemented in some other way. I did think about having supervision tree processes inherit a FD for the shell's terminal from s6-svscan, and also about using an s6-fdholderd process, and having supervision tree processes retrieve the FD from it. Although I haven't tested either yet. It seems I missed the addition of s6-svscan's -X option; I saw it one day in the output of 'ps' on a VM that was using s6-linux-init, didn't recognize it, but then forgot to look up what it did :P But I would have to 'tag' messages in some way, so that the catch-all logger recognizes them and sends them to the terminal, right? Anyway, nosetsid + /dev/tty is still the simplest implementation, I have to admit. G.
