Guillermo said on Sat, 27 Nov 2021 17:05:14 -0300 >This was meant for the mailing list. I accidentally replied to the >author instead. Sorry Leah! > >El mar, 23 nov 2021 a las 9:18, Leah Neukirchen escribió: >> >> [...] This seems to be due to runit(8) before execing >> into the stages: >> >> sig_unblock(sig_cont); >> sig_ignore(sig_cont); >> ... >> strerr_warn3(INFO, "enter stage: ", stage[st], 0); >> execve(*prog, (char *const *)prog, envp); >> >> [...] Can someone explain why? > >I guess only the author can provide an authoritative answer, but this >looks like a bug. It is possible that sig_uncatch() was meant here. >That's what the code calls for the other two signals that runit(8) >catches (SIGCHLD and SIGINT). > >sig_ignore() makes no sense here, wouldn't that make 'sv cont' useless >for processes of the init system's supervision tree?
It would seem so, and yet sv cont mydaemon starts up a paused mydaemon. So there's something we're missing. SteveT Steve Litt Spring 2021 featured book: Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/techniques
