I find it symptomatic of the fact that a guy wrote some Rube Goldberg code and a corporation decided it would be a great idea to spend millions getting the Rube Goldberg code into many major distros. As far as us running our of road with the Unix API, systemd solves no problem and offers no improvement that couldn't have been solved or improved in a dozen different ways, almost all of which would have been more modular and less prone to vendor lock in.
We know all of this. Please keep these posts out of the supervision ML. It's not that we don't like systemd-bashing, it's that it takes a lot of space and makes a lot of noise, and I'd like the supervision ML to be laser-focused on solving technical issues with supervision systems, not be yet another place where we complain about systemd day in day out. Thanks. -- Laurent
