On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:53:40 -0700, Mike Naberezny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anders Quist wrote: >> I just implemented the primitives for making it possible. I'm not sure >> if it makes sense to do an implicit reread. If add does an implicit >> reread, you may end up with this: >> >> > avail >> foo >> > add foo >> foo: no such >> >> since foo was actually not in the config any more. It seems to me that >> having an explicit read makes it easier for the user to have a mental >> model of the state of supervisord. > > The "avail" command was not implemented and the decoy was removed by > Chris in r786. The scenario above can't happen with the current > implementation. That's because I haven't submitted my avail/refresh patch yet, since I'm waiting for consensus to coalesce on if/when automatic config reloading should occur. For example, if add reloads config, avail should prolly reload it too. -- Anders Qvist, Open End AB Tel: +46 31 7490887 _______________________________________________ Supervisor-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.supervisord.org/mailman/listinfo/supervisor-users
