AFAIK the priority parameter currently has no purpose, so I guess no one uses it ;)
- Stephan Am 10.09.09 07:24, schrieb Lennart Regebro: > 2009/9/9 Chris McDonough<[email protected]>: > >> More descriptively, it transitions from STARTING to RUNNING if the process is >> still "up" after startsecs have gone by. >> > Aha. Well, in that case, depends+startsecs and startdelay would be > pretty much the same thing, actually. Although startdelay would be > easier to implement. > > 2009/9/10 Roger Hoover<[email protected]>: > >> The existing priority parameter would accomplish the same thing as a new >> depends parameter, yes? >> > You mean that it could be changed to wait for lower priority processes > to get into the running state before starting the higher ones? That > could work too, but doesn't that change the behavior from now? > > _______________________________________________ Supervisor-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.supervisord.org/mailman/listinfo/supervisor-users
