Hi Grzegorz, Good point about detecting copy/paste errors. That should be improved.
What's the use case for multiple fcgi programs sharing the same socket (as opposed to numprocs > 1)? Thanks, Roger On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Grzegorz Nosek <r...@localdomain.pl> wrote: > W dniu 29.11.2010 16:36, Laurence Rowe pisze: > > With the caveat that I do not use fastcgi myself, this sounds like > > reasonable default behaviour so a reuse_socket option might not be > > necessary at all. > > The one argument against it is detecting copy-paste errors (two > processes might accidentally share a socket). For it to be actually > useful though, error reporting should be improved quite a bit :) > > Best regards, > Grzegorz Nosek > _______________________________________________ > Supervisor-users mailing list > Supervisor-users@lists.supervisord.org > http://lists.supervisord.org/mailman/listinfo/supervisor-users >
_______________________________________________ Supervisor-users mailing list Supervisor-users@lists.supervisord.org http://lists.supervisord.org/mailman/listinfo/supervisor-users
