At lot people want this feature, including myself, but at this point no one seems to have the bandwidth to take it on. Maybe we should start a kickstarter (http://www.kickstarter.com/) project for this feature and when it gets enough pledges, perhaps Chris or Mike could take it on??? Just a crazy thought...
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:39 AM, Systems Maintenance <[email protected]> wrote: > We have N process of a wsgi app running behind nginx acting as a > proxy. When we release an update, we either have to restart each item > individually or issue a `restart wsgiapp:*` command. The problem with > the latter is that it stops all the processes, *then* starts them all. > This causes some requests to the app to fail. What would be useful would > be to stop/start each process individually, so requests can continue to > be served (nginx will simply fail over to the next backend when one > doesn't respond) and will allow us to keep a reasonable "uptime". > _______________________________________________ > Supervisor-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.supervisord.org/mailman/listinfo/supervisor-users > _______________________________________________ Supervisor-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.supervisord.org/mailman/listinfo/supervisor-users
