For future reference, I think "supervisorctl update" actually does an implicit "supervisorctl reread", right?
Regards, Jens On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Ales Zoulek <[email protected]> wrote: > Dne 23.10.2012 10:19 napsal(a): > >> Hi! >> >> supervisorctl reread; supervisorctl update >> >> Should help. >> >> Ales >> Dne 23.10.2012 10:12 "Tim Gebbett" <[email protected]> napsal(a): >> >> Hi All, >>> >>> supervisor> version >>> 3.0a8 >>> (Debian Squeeze package) >>> >>> supervisord running well for a month, looking after 8 services. >>> >>> I have added a new service to supervisor.conf (I keep all service >>> details under one conf file) >>> >>> ran supervisorctl, issued "reread", where the new service defined are >>> listed as available, >>> >>> then tried to start the process with "start <process-name - as listed >>> by the avail command> >>> >>> It returns "ERROR (no such process)" >>> >>> If I HUP the supervisor process, (clearly not good as it restarts all >>> managed processes) the new service comes up fine, and responds to >>> supervisor commands commands perfectly well. >>> >>> Any ideas on how to resolve, or where to look for further debug? >>> >>> Thanks, Tim >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Supervisor-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.supervisord.org/mailman/listinfo/supervisor-users >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > Supervisor-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.supervisord.org/mailman/listinfo/supervisor-users > > -- Want to know how full my inbox is? Or how to get in touch with me faster? Or tell me your e-mail is not that important? Then check this out: http://courteous.ly/4WtfZY
_______________________________________________ Supervisor-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.supervisord.org/mailman/listinfo/supervisor-users
