Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > This is more of a question for Sebastian (the author) than the rest of > us, though mailing the list is indeed the right thing to do. > > I'm under the impression that Sebastian doesn't test suPHP on systems > using a threaded MPM, but tests it under systems using the prefork MPM. > > Regardless of what people think, threading on UNIX is still fairly new > as far as general application adoption goes. Sure, Solaris's threading > model is fast and rock-solid, but as I'm sure you know, the number of > threaded applications is fairly low (compared to fork) on UNIX. > > Also, you have to ask yourself: is switching to a threaded MPM *really* > something you want to do on a hosting environment? Historically hosting > environments have CGIs and other scripted languages that were written > purely with the forked environment in mind (e.g. classic Apache 1.3 or > older). I am very well aware of the benefits of threads, but I often > wonder why someone would consider that model for a hosting environment. > It's still too new of a technology, IMHO. > >
I thought a moment of what you said and can't but agree. It is wiser, for now, to go for the safer prefork-model. Thanks for your input, Fili _______________________________________________ suPHP mailing list suPHP@lists.marsching.biz http://lists.marsching.com/mailman/listinfo/suphp
