Given that BOTH SM 2 and Firefox 3.5x are empty of all Add-Ons and so forth...and main or basic options on both are set to an essentially "clean" install... SM 2 takes FAR longer to load in (Windows) than Firefox 3.5x does. No matter what the system conditions, SM 2, even devoid of added Add-On's and other extras...still takes 3x to 6x longer to load in. Once cached, SM 2 load times drop, but still much longer than Firefox 3.5x.
And yes, this is seen on XP SP2, XP SP3, Vista and the initial Windows 7 as well, 2GB to 4GB CPU boxes. Strange for now, might be given some SM 2 programmer thought as time allows ? Joe _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
