Lou wrote: >Advantages / Disadvantages to SM? > With all the apps under one roof in SeaMonkey, the memory footprint is smaller than if you had Firefox, Thunderbird, ChatZilla, and KompoZer[1] all installed individually and open at once.
Decide for yourself if you like the UI better than the others. Migration of profiles is still a bit rough with SM2.0. >Any problems using SM and FF and TB? > Don't try to use the same profile 2 places at the same time and you'll be OK. . . [1] KompoZer is better than what is currently in the suite; the developer of that fork will be working with the SeaMonkey team for 2.1. http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?mode=nested&threshold=0&sid=1423895&cid=29914853#29921007 _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
