On 11/21/2009 03:47 PM, Edward wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> On 11/19/2009 07:07 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: >>> Subject: says it all. :) >> ... >>> As a secondary question, How about any 64 bit Linux >>> distributions? >> >> +1 >> Why no 'official' 64bit linux build? >> >> Rostyslaw, you can use this one in the interim (use at your own risk of >> course): >> <http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-1.9.1/> >> [seamonkey-2.0.1pre.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 20-Nov-2009 02:51 >> 14M] > > > I'm certainly willing to try the above on 64-bit Linux, but when I > installed the current (32-bit) SeaMonkey 2.0 under 64-bit Linux (Xubuntu > 9.10), it would not run. If I ran it from a terminal window, it displayed: > > ./run-mozilla.sh: 399: ./seamonkey-bin: not found > > I then checked the directory where it installed to and seamonkey-bin IS > there, showing 13,638,200 bytes. > > Any thoughts as to why the 32-bit Linux version apparently doesn't work > with 64-bit Linux?
It should: $ locate seamonkey-bin Note: I use this instead of 'seamonkey' as I have multiple installations of SeaMonkey (2.0, 2.0.1pre, 1.1.18) installed & it's easier to find the right folder(s) this way $ cd <seamonkey-binlocation> $ ./seamonkey Note that you do not run 'seamonkey-bin' but just 'seamonkey'. Note: the reasoning for using the 64bit build is to run the new 64bit flash & java plugins. There is a thread over on mozilla.dev.apps.seamonky ([2.0rc - linux] java plugin on 64bit) where Barry Edwin Gilmour & Robert (Kairo) helped me sort this out. You might want to wander over there & read through the thread. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
