Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
Ok, stupid question du jour: why doesn't the
SeaMonkey 2.1 installer have "a valid digital signature"?
Sadly we do not yet possess the ability to digitally sign our installer. It
needs a
few things to accomplish.
1) a machine much more secure than our current machines, and dedicated to just
signing.
2) a digital certificate to use for signing, from a valid certificate authority.
We have neither of those at this time, we do hope to be in a position to get
those.
But until then all our release builds are unsigned.
Sounds like a finance problem, so what is your business model?
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
