On 09/09/2011 06:55 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > NoOp wrote: > >> On 09/09/2011 04:56 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >>> NoOp wrote: >>> >>>> Works for me - is there an issue? >>>> As do the wingding characters (including smiley face et al) in this >>>> page: >>>> >>>> <http://www.alanwood.net/demos/wingdings.html> >>> >>> Ah, but you cheated: >>> >>> <td class="big"><font face="Wingdings">J</font></td> >>> <td align="center">74</td> >>> <td align="center">0x4A</td> >>> <td>smileface</td> >>> <td class="big">☺</td> >>> <td>9786</td> >>> <td>U+263A</td> >>> <td>White smiling face</td> >>> <td>Miscellaneous Symbols</td> >>> >>> You didn't tell it to display "J" in Wingdings, you told it to display >>> "☺" in Wingdings. So of course we get a smiley, because this code >>> point is blank and the browser substitutes the character from a font >>> that does have it. >> >> Sorry Paul, but that doesn't compute. I fail to see where I "cheated". >> Perhaps this will convince you... Even if I copy all 3 smileys from >> ray-nets test page (directly from the page) and paste into LibreOffice >> or Openoffice, they paste in directly as wingding characters (smileys) >> and the font displayed for the characters is wingdings. I'll be happy to >> provide screenshots if you'd like. Or would you prefer an exported PDF >> showing the characters instead? >> >> I suggest that the issue is most likely a configuration issue. The >> question is which setting (see my other posts regarding Windows). > > I don't deny that there's an issue here that needs to be resolved. I'm > simply saying this wasn't a fair test. >
And what would you consider a "fair test"? If you've another then I'll be more than happy to give it a try. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey