On 11/7/11 7:36 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote:
>> On 11/6/11 2:20 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
>>> David E. Ross wrote:
>>>> On 11/6/11 12:07 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
>>>>> David E. Ross wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/5/11 11:42 AM, Frog wrote:
>>>>>>> Frog wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am trying to make a .GIF signature file that can be attached to a
>>>>>>>> message---like I can attach a piece of clip art to a message. Can this
>>>>>>>> be done? If so, what are the steps to make this happen?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance for any help sent my way.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Frog
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          I was about to give up on this signature attempt when I learned
>>>>>>> about the Attachment of the signature being a problem.  I then decided
>>>>>>> if there was another way of accomplishing the same thing in a non image
>>>>>>> file.  I found the answer right in front of me and it seems to work with
>>>>>>> few steps involved.  Here is what I did (starting from the SeaMonkey 
>>>>>>> Inbox):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. Clicked "Compose"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. Added an "Address", "Subject", and a Message Text.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3. I then clicked the selection V at the end of the small window
>>>>>>> containing "Variable Width" typed in it. (This small window is located
>>>>>>> under the subject space and above the message space.  I then selected
>>>>>>> "Script MT Bold" from the drop down list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 4. I next selected the font size for the signature by either clicking
>>>>>>> the A Up Arrow or the A Down Arrow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 5. Lastly, I sent the message.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Note: All of the settings I made during this process reverted back to
>>>>>>> the original settings once the message was sent.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          I hope this all makes sense...if not, let me know.  Also, I
>>>>>>> believe this procedure will work without involving the attachment
>>>>>>> problem identified in some of the responses...if not, let me know.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          Thanks again for your help.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Frog
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The recipient will see your signature in Script MT Bold only if he or
>>>>>> she has installed that font.  According to
>>>>>> <http://www.codestyle.org/css/font-family/index.shtml>, that font
>>>>>> appears on only 58% of Windows systems and not at all on Mac or Linux
>>>>>> systems.
>>>>>>
>>>>> So the best way is composing an html signature with an embedded .gif file.
>>>>
>>>> Not really.  The recipient might have blocked the opening of
>>>> attachments.  As I said before in this thread, inline graphics files
>>>> (GIF, JPEG, BMP, PNG, etc) are separated from an E-mail message as the
>>>> message traverses the Internet.  They are treated as attachments until
>>>> the recipient's E-mail application recombines them with the message --
>>>> BUT ONLY IF the recipient allows attachments to be opened and does not
>>>> force HTML-formatted messages to be viewed as if ASCII-formatted.
>>>>
>>>> Why would a recipient block the opening of a GIF file?  Because GIF
>>>> files (and other graphics files, too) have been known to carry malware,
>>>> according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's US-CERT.
>>>>
>>>
>>> So there is no way to achieve:
>>> "I want to type in Script MT Bold//Font Size 22//Microsoft Word my
>>> signature"
>>>
>>> If the receiver did not have this font installed.
>>> And embedding a gif file (a printscreen of the text) into an html
>>> signature doesnot work also if the receiver block attachement.
>>>
>>> Did you have a solution ?
>>
>> Do a plain-text signature.
>>
> Why we cannot use a beautiful signature ?
> I was at work using Outlook, and *all* our signatures were we have all 
> our details, phone number, position, plus the logo of our company - all 
> of that very nice. Nobody have complained about it.
> If the receiver want to stay in the past allowing only plain text, this 
> is his choice - We don't care ... he should live in the present.

Your signature in that case merely conveyed how clever you were.  Since
I strip away all attachments from incoming E-mail, I would never see
your logo without manually opening the file in PhotoEd.  Nobody might
have complained, but did EVERYONE really see the intended design of your
signature?

-- 

David E. Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>.

Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive
bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation.
© 1997 by David E. Ross
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to