On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:55:04 -0400, BIll Spikowski <b...@spikowski.com> wrote:
>Rick Merrill wrote: >> BIll Spikowski wrote: >>> NoOp wrote: >>>> I wonder what affect this will have on the SeaMonkey email client: > + + + + + + +> > >Your idea would help a lot, but my e-mail archives are an invaluable >treasure to my business and I would NEVER trust their long-term >storage to the cloud, or to anyone else's email servers. > >I'll admit that my personal system using Seamonkey is cumbersome (POP >at my office to permanently store emails, and IMAP on my laptop so I >can read and respond to emails comfortably while traveling without >duplicating their storage), but I sure haven't figured out any other >system that would work for me! Yes, I'm one of those people who would >pay for continuing minor improvements to Seamonkey. > I'm also a SeaMonkey fan. Browsers in SM and FireFox are similar to me but Mail and Address Books in SM are much better than Thunderbird. Biggest SeaMonkey things for me are: having nice lists/subgroups within address books and, using the excellent full column layout when selecting multiple addresses from my address books for an email message. Some day I may start saving messages in SeaMonkey. As it is, I'm still saving messages as text files and storing those (the scheme I started in the BBS days). One concern: will SM be affected by switching to IPv6. {grin} -- JohnW-Mpls _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey