Oh, sorry. I missed out on exactly what you wanted me to use as reference. I was just about to go out and visit a friend but I will have this tab visible so that when I get home I won't forget to report how the new test with a simple static html page turns out.
Regards Rickard G Den fredagen den 13:e juli 2012 kl. 13:06:55 UTC+2 skrev Philip TAYLOR: > rickard wrote: > > > I used a single tab in both browsers and headed over to > www.aftonbladet.se which has quite some stuff going on (flash, a lot of > animated pictures) and these are the results I got after letting the browsers > just sit still for a few minutes: > > > > Opera 12 - 5h 24m > > Seamonkey - 3h 01m > > OK, but that didn't really address my question, which is "Does > Seamonkey > use excessive resources only on dynamic pages (such as the one you > describe), or does it also use excessive resources on a single, > non-animated, no-plugin-dependencies, static HTML page ? > > Philip Taylor _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
