Ant wrote:
> On 7/14/2012 5:45 PM PT, Ant typed:
> 
>>> So, using what Philip said, give yourself a new, empty, profile for SM
>>> 2.10.1!! Then 2.0.14 will have a profile (the default) and 2.10.1 will
>>> use the new one, never to interfere with each other (unless you want).
>>
>> Weird. My two SM installations are confused now. I told v2.10.1 to
>> always use the new clean profile and I tell v2.0.14 to always use the
>> old profile, but they are confused. My old ones detect new extensions
>> for compatibility issues. I tried manual Profile Manager and noticed it
>> selects the wrong one by default. Ugh!
> 
> Yep, SM v2.0.14 wiped out my newer extensions from SM v2.10.1 when using
> the newer profile. I will have to manually carefully pick the correct
> profile and can't rely on the automatic default profile selection :/

Yes, 2.0.14 and 2.10.1 use the same code to determine "default" profile,
so if you change it in one it affects both.

A workaround could be to set your shortcut to use -P <profilename> on
its command line, and that will force it to launch with the desired profile.

-- 
~Justin Wood (Callek)
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to