Ant wrote:
The problem is that those files are very new and unknown. So Norton is supsicious of them. Also, using beta/prereleases doesn't help since they can change again soon. It is good to submit those suspicious files, but note that it will happen again.
If novelty is enough to arouse suspicion, the program is too stupid to be worth your hard-earned money. It should be looking for suspicious chunks of code, or suspicious behavior, or what the police would call "probable cause."
FWIW, my Norton has never alerted on any Netscape or Mozilla product. There seems to be a wide variety of experiences with Norton -- some people swear by it, others swear at it, and I see no rhyme or reason that would explain which is which.
The only complaint I have is that in the old days, if you let your subscription expire, the program would still run with the old definitions, but now if you let it expire, the program will not run at all.
-- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
