NoOp wrote:
On 10/11/2012 04:52 AM, Daniel wrote:
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120826
SeaMonkey/2.12

In the last few days, I've caught up on about two weeks of posts in
m.s.seamonkey and m.general, and somewhere, in those several hundred
posts, there was a post mentioning files and folders in SM's cache
folder, with names like along the lines of _CACHE_001_, _CACHE_MAP_, and
folders named (hexadecimally) 0 to F

Unfortunately, after re-reading that message, I didn't re-mark it as
"Unread" so that I could easily find it, if necessary.

  From what I read in the post, someone (I think NoOp) said they were
caused by Windows and to just delete them, and not worry about it. So,
last night, after closing SM, I deleted the Cache folder. Tonight,
before I had started my SM browser, they were all back!

That thread was in reference to 'Cache.Trash' files, not the standard
'Cache' files:

Subject: Re: Cache.Trash26316
References: <h-ednvktyoiyzo_nnz2dnuvz_sadn...@mozilla.org>
In-Reply-To: <h-ednvktyoiyzo_nnz2dnuvz_sadn...@mozilla.org>
Message-ID: <q8odns47wocxionnnz2dnuvz_qudn...@mozilla.org>

<quote>
As I understand it, in Windows, when SM or FF experience a session
crash/failure, the existing cache is written to cache.trash. This
apparently was to assist in preserving the cache.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=mozilla+%2B+cache.trash
<https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/15.0/releasenotes/buglist.html>
o 754575        Cache.Trash* files fill up disk space
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754575>
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=cache.trash>
</quote>


Hang on....as I understand it, NoOp, e-mail and irc files are not written to cache, just files required to display a web-site in the browser.

If these files are already written to cache, if a crash occurs why do I need them re-written somewhere else?? All I should need is a listing of the sites that were open in the browser at the time of failure, so, when re-started, FF/SM could re-create my browser screen, either by using the files in Cache *or* re-downloading the files from the sites if expired.

So why the double up??

--
Daniel
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to