Philip TAYLOR wrote: > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> Aha, a *good* day for Google! Though it must be said, using a better >> editor is no guarantee the result will be error-free. Most all >> commercial pages on the Web are composed with some kind of professional >> editor, such as DreamWeaver. It churns out horrible code most of the >> time. It all boils down to the human author, a person who is *aware* >> that it takes a great deal of effort and training to produce error-free >> pages. > > I use nothing but Dreamweaver (8.02), and every page I author is > 100%-valid HTML 4.01 Strict. Dreamweaver does not emit bad code by > default, and it is pretty hard to persuade it so to do.
That's good to hear; obviously you care. Most commercial sites don't. -- -bts -This space for rent, but the price is high _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
