Daniel <d...@albury.nospam.net.au> wrote: > Rob wrote: >> Ray_Net <tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be> wrote: >>> 2. A firefox guy is complaining about lag when accessing web pages .. >>> could this feature slow firefox. >> >> This is not very likely. The feature works by downloading a list >> of infected sites at a certain interval, then storing this list >> in a local file. The file is then consulted during browsing. >> >> So there is no extra query to a single server that has to reply before >> a page is shown, like in some competing system. > > Hey, Rob, in your first para, you say that a list is downloaded, so in > your second para, you *must be wrong* when you state there is "no extra > query to a single server that has to reply". > > Of course, this extra wait time will depend on how often SM has to > download the list of infected sites, daily, weekly, whatever.
No. There is no extra wait time. The download proceeds in the background while you are working on your computer, not at the time you click a link. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
