Gerry Hickman wrote:
Part of the reason to choose SeaMonkey is you get "all in one", so we
really need the components to work together. Choosing BlueGriffon would
be a bit like choosing FireFox + ThunderBird instead of SM.
Composer also has integration, you can be viewing a page and hit CTRL+E
to edit the page.
If "one" of the "all in one" components doesn't work? Or feails miserably?
Create a page using Composer
Then submit it to the W3C Validator.
http://validator.w3.org/
Are you happy with the total SeaMonkey experience?
Composer sucks. For a decade or more. Yes, most WYSIWYG HTML editors
such too. No excuse. Strip it out of the suite. Kill it. It's dead.
It's offensive to let it sit there and die a horribly slow death.
You want to make a Web page? A billion other options. Like, maybe
learning someing about HTML and CSS>
--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
Old dog still learning - please don't shoot yet
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
