In <news:zkqdndvcejtdfhlpnz2dnuvz_jadn...@mozilla.org>, NoOp <gl...@sbcglobal.net.invalid> wrote:
> If I use <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/> as a base for > testing, both SeaMonkey and Firefox (both are Mozilla versions & not > distro versions) I get: > Shockwave > FlashShockwave Flash 11.2 r202 vulnerable 'Update Now' > > However if I use the same test with Chromium I get: > Shockwave Flash > Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202 'Up to Date' > > So now I test all three with > <http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player/kb/find-version-flash-player.html> > and get '11.2.202.327' for all three. > > So what gives? Why does the Mozilla plugin check report that the > Chromium version (same libflashplayer.so is in use) is fine, yet > reports that the SeaMonkey versions are 'vulnerable' and out of date? > Anyone else getting the same (with linux)? I get the same behavior, using the same Flash version. I don't have an answer other than to note that the Mozilla's plugin checking page has always sucked. This bug is <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=801329>, and the tracking bug for all the plugin checking problems is <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=821279>. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
