Which is the more reliable way to forward emails: inline or as an attachment?
For raw text InLine is clearly better. For email in MIME encoding either method seems to work equally well. For email with JPG attachments either method appears to work fine. But For fwd of email in HTML it makes a difference depending on what client is sending and what client is receiving. When pictures are embedded in HTML a number of strange things will happen. Sometimes you may see a bunch of broken-pictures then the actual pictures. Sometimes your recipient will say "it would be better with the pictures". As a <snob> user of only SeaMonkey I can't identify with users of "Outlook whatever" ;-) _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
