In <news:ccudnblyj-6c4xxonz2dnuvz_oedn...@mozilla.org>, "Paul B. Gallagher" <pau...@pbgdashtranslations.com> wrote:
> Daniel wrote: > > On 30/05/14 13:23, Hartmut Figge wrote: > >> Geoff Welsh: > >>> Hartmut Figge wrote: > >> > >>>> It should suffice to select for Western and Unicode. > >>> > >>> It /should/ suffice to choose ONE font that I like to (or can > >>> easily) read, and have all messages I select appear in that font > >> > >> For SM, the diplayed font depends on the Character Encoding of the > >> message. > > > > So, Hartmut, this must mean that somewhere with-in the message > > header, the font in which it was composed *must* be listed, doesn't > > it?? > > No, unless it's an HTML message, which can contain a font > specification. > > For a plain-text message, you'll see only the charset tag, and SM > will use that info to decide which font to use in displaying it. And if there is no charset specified in the headers of a text/plain message, the charset is implicitly US-ASCII. In that case, I believe SeaMonkey displays it with the user's font choice for western encodings. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
