On 25/03/15 02:04, pjdkru...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, March 23, 2015 at 3:33:24 PM UTC-4, mozilla-li...@spamgourmet.com
wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 23/03/15 14:46, Philip Chee wrote:
On 22/03/2015 22:46, Daniel wrote:
Thank you, Mark, I now understand. One wonders why "they" don't separate
out the newer versions, maybe "they" only list the most popular two
individually.
There are several picklists and sliders on the right where you can
change how many versions are shown for what time period, etc.
Phil
Thanks for that, Phil, I hadn't noticed that. I set the "Top N" to 10
and ver 2.33 was still not showing ... bit of a worry!! :-(
2.33 shows up when you set Top N to 15. When you do, you see that it's
been more active than any other individual version for about the last
week. Probably not quite more active than all other versions put
together, but it doesn't look far off. Hence my doubts as to how the
rankings for the Top N are calculated!
Mark.
IF the "Top" picks are cumulative then 2.33 will not be top because it hasn't been out
long enough, and 2.26 will probably remain at the top because it was the "stalled"
version, lasting for 3 entire release periods when 2.27 and 2.28 were skipped.
but, one would then hope that 2.29, 2.30, 2.31 and 2.32, which have each
had their full six weeks, would then have had heaps of installs!
--
Daniel
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.32 Build identifier: 20141218225909
or
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.33 Build identifier: 20150215202114
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
