On 19/04/2015 18:00, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Hi all,

it would be great if some of you could share their experience with
add-on compatibility. It would be a horrible work for a single person to
leave comments on <https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/AddonCompat>
"SeaMonkey/AddonCompat" for all the liste add-ons (and there might exist
hundreds or thousands not listet there). But if lots of users only leave
1 comment / each that page might become a useful data base, soon.

The core questions are:
a) Is the original add-on (download from AMO) compatible?
b) Is the compatibility rating on AMO page correct (sometimes
    you will find a warning "not available for SM 2.33.1", but
    Installed Addon will work fine
c) If not compatible, what minor or serious problems have
    been observed with what test environment?
d) If original add-on is not compatible, does converted Version
    (see <https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/AddonCompat> work or
    what minor or serious problems have
    been observed with what test environment?
e) Is a compatible (or alternative) add-on available, may be form other
source than AMO?

You can easily add your observations on the wiki page (it's not a
problem to subscribe and to get an account).
Or if you do not want to edit the page, you can add a posting here in
the thread as I will do for an add-on in few minutes here.

Come on, anybody here who will start with a statement concerning
"Automatic Save Folder 1.0.4 "
<https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/automatic-save-folder/>?

Thank you in advance and best regards

Rainer Bielefeld
I've been delighted recently when I discovered that the Orthodox Theme
could work for SeaMonkey 2.33.1 as I haven't been able to use it for a few
previous SeaMonkey releases
Once again proud of teams working on SeaMonkey!!!
Best Regards
@lex
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to