WaltS48 wrote:
On 10/09/2015 07:01 AM, Daniel wrote:
Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 17:45:06 +1100, Daniel <dan...@albury.net.spam.au>
wrote:

On 8/10/2015 5:42 PM, Daniel wrote:
On 8/10/2015 5:26 PM, Edmund Wong wrote:
Hi,

Just wondering if anyone has encountered any issues with
the GTK3 built version of 2.39.

TB and Firefox backed out the necessary manifests[1] in order
to build with gtk3 and I'm wondering if it's necessary
for us to follow suite.

Edmund

[1] - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1207310

Thank you,ewong, for reminding me to check for new betas!!

Hmm! Cannot see 2.39 listed on
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/

Maybe here:
https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/

- Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP]

I thought nightly's were pre-alpha!



I thought Nightlies were alpha, aurora is beta, beta is release
candidate and release usually ticks off a portion of users.

Hmm! What would I know?? I thought aurora was SeaMonkey/Mozilla speak for Alpha!

--
Daniel

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:21.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/21.0 SeaMonkey/2.18 Build identifier: 20130502201647
or

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:21.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/21.0 SeaMonkey/2.18 Build identifier: 20130403022815
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to