On 1/31/17, NFN Smith <worldoff9...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Richard Owlett wrote:
>> I'm looking for a "HTML Viewer/Editor" *NOT* a browser.
>> The closest I've seen is the Composer portion of SeaMonkey.
>>
>> The pages I'm interested in viewing/editing are:
>> - Strictly local
>> - HTML 4 [ I know of NO desired feature introduced by HTML5]
>> - No JavaScript
>> - Capability to view image(s) retrieved from web.
>>   NO capability to render a web page or Publish to web location
>>    - use of validator.w3.org will be external
>>
>> Some of this is imprecise, I'm still refining my goals.
>> Suggested stand alone software?
>> TIA
>>
>
> I'm assuming that you know that support for the Seamonkey composer was
> dropped years ago. To me, one of the nice things about it is that
> because it's bundled, if I'm looking at an HTML page in Seamonkey, I can
> press CTRL-E, and edit immediately.  That's great for the local
> documents that I maintain in HTML. However, the tradeoff is that the
> composer produces relatively sloppy HTML.  I have found that for stuff
> that I distribute, it's generally necessary to clean up the HTML, using
> a tool such as Tidy.
>
> There's a couple of stand-alone projects that are Gecko based:
>
> - Kompozer (http://www.kompozer.net/). I believe that this one derived
> from the Seamonkey Composer. I haven't checked the HTML closely, but
> it's likely to be as sloppy.  Kompozer is also out of development -- the
> last release was 0.8.3b, in early 2010.
>
> - Nvu, which is even older than Kompozer, and docs indicate that
> Kompozer is derived from Nvu. The only reason that I mention it here is
> that if you see reference to that name, you should ignore it.
>
> - BlueGriffon (http://www.bluegriffon.org/) seems to have taken the bulk
> of Mozilla-centric developer attention.  There's a free version, but
> there's also licensed versions with additional capacities.

Amaya (https://www.w3.org/Amaya/) is another.  Altho the last release
was 2012 so not terribly current,
It supports HTML 4.01, XHTML 1.0, XHTML Basic, XHTML 1.1, HTTP 1.1,
MathML 2.0, many CSS 2 features, and SVG.


> For what I need, I'm content with Kompozer -- from the little bits of
> playing I've done with BlueGriffon, I don't need the extra capacities,
> and coming from Seamonkey, there's several quirks in the BlueGriffon UI,
> which I find to be clumsy. I haven't checked to see if it produces
> cleaner HTML.

I've tried all of them & still prefer Seamonkey composer.

Lee
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to