On 4/02/2017 11:08 PM, Mr. Ed wrote:
On 02/04/17 6:59 AM, Mr. Ed wrote:
On 02/04/17 4:19 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 4/02/2017 10:25 AM, WaltS48 wrote:
On 02/03/2017 03:24 PM, Mr. Ed wrote:
Just wondering why the majority of the posts do not mention, in the
Subject, The
OS and SM version together.
While it's true that some (many?) bugs will have an effect on more
than one OS
or SM version we would not have to look at message headers to
determine what
could be a simple entry in the Subject field.
Just wondering...........
To add to what Paul indicated.
Some of us have, "mailnews.headers.showUserAgent" set to "true" so we
see your user agent in the message header.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:51.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.48
which makes me wonder ... as the latest SM available from
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ is V 2.46, is Mr Ed really using a V 2.48
or is he using a V 2.48b1 or similar??
Whatever 'UserAgent' says. I haven't changed it except to 'not advertise FF'
option.
https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/
Woops, wrong place for 2.48 - It's here (UNOFFICIAL):
http://www.m64.info/index.php/seamonkey-64-bit-download
One wonders who runs m64.info, as the real SeaMonkey website is
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ !!
--
Daniel
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.46 Build identifier: 20161213183751
or
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.38 Build identifier: 20150903203501
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
