Daniel wrote: > On 7/05/2017 6:16 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: >> No I said. The logical step from aurora would switch to beta. Beta is >> 2.51 at the moment. 2.50 is the current release. > > It should be stressed that these are Adrian's private releases ..i.e. > Adrian has a SM 2.50 release version and a SM 2.51 Beta version, maybe. > > The latest Official release in SM 2.46 and there will, shortly > hopefully, be a SM 2.48 Beta release which will then become a SM 2.48 > Release Version and then the SM 2.49 (Beta) will be the start of the ESR > versions. > > At least, as I understand things!!
That might explain why I can't find a 2.50, or 2.51 beta in here: https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/ https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/nightly/ But there is a tinderbox build, which sounds like fun. :) https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/tinderbox-builds/comm-beta-linux/1494033293/ > >> If you compile yourself clone comm-esr52 and apply the patch for bug >> 1353765: >> >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1353765 >> This gives you 2.49.1 which has all security patches from 2.50 Fx 53. >> The 2.49 esr line will be the basis for the the next stable releases as >> stated. 2.50+ still have some problems which are fixed but not as fast >> as usual and you might end up with a broken build in the future. 2.54 >> based on gecko 57 might become a tough cookie depending on how fast >> classic extension and theme support is to be removed. >> >> 2.49 and 2.50 profiles should be interchangeable but if you see an >> indexDB error in the error console blow away the storage folder, >> storage.* and webappsstore* from you profile. >> >> There are changes in favicon handling in 2.52 and such a profile might >> not be 100% compatible with an older version. >> >> FRG > _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
