Lee wrote on 10-01-18 14:10:
On 1/10/18, Ray_Net <tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be> wrote:
Lee wrote on 10-01-18 05:35:
On 1/9/18, Ray_Net <tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be> wrote:
Lee wrote on 09-01-18 13:14:
On 1/8/18, Ray_Net <tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be> wrote:
Lee wrote on 08-01-18 23:19:
On 1/8/18, Ray_Net <tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be> wrote:
Lee wrote on 08-01-18 01:06:
On 1/7/18, Ray_Net <tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be> wrote:
Lee wrote on 07-01-18 22:44:
summary: The vuln. mitigation is to install noscript + request
policy
continued or uMatrix + uBlock Origin or whatever other addon combo
that allows javascript from only whitelisted sites.

On 1/7/18, Ray_Net <tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be> wrote:
WaltS48 wrote on 06-01-18 18:05:
On 1/6/18 2:36 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
I have read:

"Disable Javascript until browser company comes out with patch
for
vulnerable Javascript."

So, will SM issue a patch against the Spectre exploit ?
Mozilla needs to come up with a patch first.  What they have now
only
blocks the obvious timing attack methods.

SeaMonkey 2.49.1 is based on Firefox 52 ESR code, and Firefox 52
ESR
doesn't have SharedBufferArray enabled.
||
||SharedArrayBuffer| is already disabled in Firefox 52 ESR.
||
|REF:
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2018-01/

Would it mean that we are protected ?
No.

Look at the FF advisory
        The precision of performance.now() has been reduced from
5μs
to
20μs, and the SharedArrayBuffer feature has been disabled because
it
can be used to construct a high-resolution timer.

SeaMonkey doesn't implement the SharedArrayBuffer feature but I'm
guessing it's performance.now() function still has the 5μs
resolution
and that will take a patch to fix.

But changing the performance.now() resolution is not sufficient.
Take
a
look at
https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2018/01/03/mitigations-landing-new-class-timing-attack/
        Furthermore, other timing sources and time-fuzzing
techniques
are
being worked on.

Which is like saying we've locked the front door so nobody can
walk
right in anymore but the ground floor windows are still wide open.

Follow the "other timing sources and time-fuzzing techniques" link
to
https://gruss.cc/files/fantastictimers.pdf
        Abstract. Research showed that microarchitectural attacks
like
cache
attacks can be performed through websites using JavaScript. These
timing attacks allow an adversary to spy on users secrets such as
their keystrokes,leveraging fine-grained timers. However, the W3C
and
browser vendors responded to this significant threat by eliminating
fine-grained timers from JavaScript. This renders previous
high-resolution microarchitectural attacks non-applicable.

        >>We demonstrate the inefficacy of this mitigation<< by
finding
and
evaluating a wide range of new sources of timing information. We
develop measurement methods that exceed the resolution of official
timing sources by to orders of magnitude on all major browsers,
and
even more on Tor browser. Our timing measurements do not only
re-enable previous attacks to their full extent but also allow
implementing new attacks. We demonstrate a new DRAM-based covert
channel between a website and an unprivileged app in a virtual
machine
without network hardware. Our results emphasize that quick-fix
mitigations can establish a dangerous false sense of security.


In short, performance.now() and SharedBufferArray are the
easy/obvious
ways to get a high resolution timer in javascript but they're not
the
only possible methods.

So... what to do?  The exploit mitigation is to install noscript +
request policy continued or uMatrix + uBlock Origin or whatever
other
addon combo that allows javascript from only whitelisted sites.

Regards,
Lee
For "Request Policy" we have for all versions:
This add-on is not compatible with your version of SeaMonkey.
"Request Policy" was the original - you want "RequestPolicy
Continued"
which is easier to use:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/requestpolicy-continued/

which links to
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/downloads/file/747484/requestpolicy_continued-1.0.beta13.2-fx+sm.xpi

For "NoScript Security Suite" we have:
Only with FireFox.
yeah.. you need to scroll down to 'version history' & click on 'see
all versions'
It looks like 5.1.8.3 is the last one that will work w/ SM
       Works with Firefox 45.0 - 56.0, SeaMonkey 2.42 - *
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/downloads/file/806790/noscript_security_suite-5.1.8.3-fx+sm.xpi

Regards
Lee
Anyway, it's better that SM solve problems instead of a need to
install
a myriad of extensions.
agreed.  But I like having more control over what's allowed than the
javascript.enabled on/off switch & extensions are the only way I know
of to get that.

Regards
Lee
I think that Microsoft had installed yesterday an emergency patch for
adressing meltdown and spectre.
https://blog.trendmicro.com/fixing-meltdown-spectre-vulnerabilities/
and ....
Microsoft yesterday released an emergency patch for Windows 10 to
address this prior to Patch Tuesday, which incorporates KAISER in
KB4056892
I haven't forced an update yet; my last windows update was 12/28, so
I'm still unprotected.

https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/Speculation-Control-e36f0050
     This zip file contains a PowerShell module that can be used to
confirm whether a system has enabled the protections needed to
validate that the speculation control vulnerability.

I just tried it and everything is false.. which agrees w/ my not
getting any updates yet.

Regards,
Lee
My Anti-Virus had created an entry in the registry to tell microsoft
that he may install the patch KB4056892
and the day after, windows-update runned silently installing this patch.
Have you also updated your cpu microcode?

How to do that ? with a soldering iron ? :-)
Preferably with an update from whoever made your machine.


Thank you for this information.
So I have just done now an "update check" with the lenovo program installed on my machine a "Lenovo Thinkpad"
This check tells me that a bios update is ready to be installed.
So I installed it just now.
Therefore I must be protected at the same levels than you.
Thank you again.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to