Paul Bergsagel wrote on 16/09/2020 10:56 AM:
Daniel wrote:
Paul Bergsagel wrote on 15/09/2020 12:59 PM:
Daniel wrote:
Paul Bergsagel wrote on 14/09/2020 11:30 AM:
Hi,
I downloaded the build by W9G seamonkey-2.53.5b1pre on September
13 (today). I the last build I had downloaded was from September 7.
The first thing I Noticed was how fast and responsive it was
compared to the build from September 7 that I had been using. Has
anyone else tried any of the builds by W9G recently and noticed the
speed and responsiveness improvements. What a difference.
BTW I am using MacOS 10.15.6.
Paul, when you installed the latest, did you flush the cache to
ensure the SM had to re-acquire the web-site data i.e. to stop it
just re-using the Cached data??
I don't use the cache and have it set to use 0 mb of disk space. The
browser was to retrieving stored data from the cache.
Hmm! Sorry, Paul, did you mean "The browser was *not set* to
retrieving stored data from the cache."??
Yes. I don't use the cache when browsing.
O.K., so that means that when you go to a web-site, SM *must* get the
required information anew, so things must be happening faster.
However, I expect 'The Web' is not acting faster just because you are
using SM 2.53.5b1pre, just your computer device must be displaying
things a bit quicker .... so I'm having troubles thinking there would be
a really noticeable speed increase ... marginal, Yeah, sure, but greatly
increased ... don't know!!
But, if it seems so, to you, great!!
--
Daniel
Win7 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.5 Build identifier: 20190609032134
Linux User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
