[EMAIL PROTECTED] scriveva: > >> is happy to run on build 552; it is slow because run on a > >> slow system; the memory profile and resource use of kaffe > >> is far better respect sun jre. > >> Take care of this compatibility; IMHO is more important > >> then that the mean Freenet developer think. > > > >It crashes in minutes on my machine. The developers have been somewhat > >nonresponsive, the bugs seem to be deep magick and the Project Leaders > >have determined that we don't need to spend money making Kaffe work with > >Freenet. > > This statement is very important; IMHO the Freenet Project > need an explicit position on that question. > > Project Leaders, can we hear you ? > > Releasing the main code under GPL is ineffective, if the > .jar need proprietary software; in my understanding > the use of the GPL licence is incorrect; I think in > this case LGPL is the right type of licence. > > Anyway, till Freenet remains in java, dropping the Kaffe > compatibility IMHO is a fundamental mistake, both from > the point of view of free software and from the security. > > The only other way to solve this problem is IMU, to > release a C (or other freely compilable/runnable language) > version
Totally agree with Marco: this shows my old sensation, Freenet is a good project but not its developer group :-( _______________________________________________ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
