On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 03:44:20PM +0200, Ole Tange wrote: > On Wed, 19 May 2004 20:32:08 +0100, Toad wrote: > > > and most of the rest are > > behind NATs which the user doesn't properly work around. :) > > Is there any reason why we cannot use STUN to avoid the NAT problems? It > ought to be fairly simple to encapsulate the TCP-packets in UDP.
What is STUN? Certainly we could write a UDP transport... > > /Ole -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
