On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 01:06:51PM +0100, Evert wrote: > And will RES remain more or less constant, or will it increase with uptime?
It should be stable. > > Regards, > Evert > > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 15:25 +0100, Evert wrote: > >> Hi all! > >> > >> I have a newbie(?) question about memory use of Freenet. From top: > >> > >> PID user PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > >> 6801 freenet 26 1 524m 140m 10m S 10.2 13.9 3:59.21 java > >> > >> Why is VIRT 524m? That seems like quite a bit for a freenet-config that is > >> set to use 101M, or am I wrong? > > > > You are wrong. VIRT has very little to do with the actual memory usage; > > it's RES that matters. Which is reasonable - 101M plus JVM overheads. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
