It's not suicide, it's progression. The people who accept it will enjoy the new, better freenet, those who don't will continue to live in the past until they can be persuaded.

On 21 Aug 2006 13:18:13 -0400, Rowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is the sort of thing that happens when you break backward
compatibility and/or interoperability. You throw away all the user base
and goodwill you've built up over the years. THAT'S suicide.

On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 11:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Anyway, I won't argue on that because the decision is not in my hands.
> The fact is that 0.7 is the only supported version and that it is the
> future. Not linking to the current version and gripping to the old one
> would be an interesting kind of suicide for a project that's a constant
> work-in-progress..."
>
> Suicide? So the fact that gaim has 1.5 in their downloads section when
> they have 2.0 beta 3 out is suicide? The fact that some Linux distros
> still use the 2.4 kernel is suicide? Funny how they're all still here
> and quite popular....
> Linking to 0.7 is suicide. New people come, download it, find there's
> nothing there, and leave. And don't try again later. I understand that
> there are good reasons behind developing the darknet....but for most
> users looking at freenet, they're looking for an opennet. And they're
> looking for a network up and running. They're not expecting something
> that's just barely starting.
>
> On 8/21/06, Julien Cornuwel < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> >
> > > .7 has very few users, very little content, and no opennet.
> > > It's useless for new users.
> >
> >
> > I'm not sure stopping linking it on the website would help it have more
> > users. About content, I see new freesites apearing quite the same rythm
> > as on 0.5 so it's just a matter of time for 0.7 to have as much content
> > as 0.5.
> >
> > > And the security that you say is better has yet to be tested. I
> >
> >
> > Where did I say that ? In "the same security level." ?
> > AFAIK, "the same" is not equal to "better". Maybe I'm wrong.
> >
> > > wouldn't bet on something that's only been around for a few months vs.
> > > something that's been slowly improving for...well, longer than I've
> > > known freenet.
> >
> >
> > Anyway, I won't argue on that because the decision is not in my hands.
> > The fact is that 0.7 is the only supported version and that it is the
> > future. Not linking to the current version and gripping to the old one
> > would be an interesting kind of suicide for a project that's a constant
> > work-in-progress...
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Support mailing list
> > Support@freenetproject.org
> > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
> >
> >
> >
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
My skills and contact info: http://www.blcss.com/contactme.php
Public Freenet gateway: http://blcss.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl


_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe

_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to