Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So in summary, for the small file the two networks were comparable - > 1:30ish vs 2:00ish. For the ISO, I'm not sure if there was any > conclusion? > > My 2 cents: Inserts are much faster after the changes to load limiting > just before xmas, or at least, they should be. Generally freenet 0.7 > uses close to the bandwidth limit now, which it certainly didn't before. > > Comments? > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 06:12:31AM -0800, this.is.not.my.real.email.address . wrote:
> > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You missed the part where that person uploaded a 500 meg file in 23 hours. They also sent a subsequent message where someone else downloaded the file in 18 hours. I'm running the 0.5 network now and I have been able to download some files. It's not as fast their downloads, but it's faster then 0.7 downloads. _______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
