On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:42:56 +0100, bqz69 <bq...@telia.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 07 January 2009 02:53:19 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:30:55 +0100, user1 <bq...@telia.com> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:19:43 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > > On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1 <bq...@telia.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be > > > > > running steady (has been running for the last couple of days). > > > > > > > > > > I did following: > > > > > [cut] > > > > > > > > That's an ugly[1] hack :). And, doesn't your run.sh start a > > > > wrapper > > > > > > > > Though, we have similar physical ram space--I have a bit more, > > > > 384MB. (Why is 100M not enough again?) Do you have other big > > > > memory users running on your system? > > > > > > No > > Even if an ugly hack, my freenet is running, and that was my purpose. > > I have a wrapper log, yes.
Yes, but, almost the only purpose for using a wrapper is to do precisely that :)--to restart the node if it ever crashes :). I wonder why the wrapper isn't doing this. Are you sure the wrapper is running? :) (maybe your wrapper.log is old). _______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
