On 08/31/2010 11:36 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote: > Yea, data persistence isn't that great at the moment. But you > "hosting" all the data just isn't how Freenet works. (Someone correct > me if I'm wrong.) Each node is intended to specialize around a tight > keyspace -- I believe this is intrinsic to the routing algorithms. > I'm not sure how your "location" (every node has one, which is > directly related to the keys you're supposed to specialize in) would > be handled if you hacked the code to promiscuously handle any key. My > guess is it would make the topology of the network less efficient.
if this is true it is totally not what i expected. very interesting! >> so, ahh, what does the persistence column exactly mean in freenet? > > Good question :b. i grepped through the source but i couldn't figure it out. looks like a question for toad. 1. it seems i need to verify whether or not persistence = forever is keeping a local copy. sounds like it might not be. 2. if there is some tight key space voodoo going on then maybe whip up a script to check periodically if file foo is available and if not reinsert. am i thinking about this correctly? many thanks for suggestions! - eric c
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
