On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 11:51 -0400, Evan Daniel wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Ray Jones <crawlz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 07/26/2011 06:15 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote > >> The electronic attacks mentioned above are far cheaper than any >scheme to try to get people who run Freenet to spy on their friends. >You can only spy on your direct friends (well, it gets less accurate >the
Lets suggest you are a group of young Libyan men, who want to fight Gadaffi without G knowing. You meet such groups in certain Libyan cities and discuss, then you start a darknet, only with people you have met personally and exchanged nodes at these meetings only let's say by exchaning one cd each node. Then you do planning of what to do to get rid of Gadaffi using this darknet... Then nobody but the implied persons of the darknet will know. Of course if a spy from Gadaffi becomes part of the darknet from joining such meetings, this person could compromise everything. But as long as the darknet is running properly with trusted persons only you have a very safe heaven. If compromised you could close down that darknet and start a new darknet with proper people. And so on ..... You could even make a new darknet twice a year to ascertain it is not compromised. It could be a group of gangsters or porno people etc - only the phantasy sets the limit..... This was an attempt to explain the principle with simple terms of how a darknet could be used *smile* _______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
