On Tuesday 09 Oct 2012 13:10:43 guido wrote: > Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2012, 10:33:35 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > > On Monday 08 Oct 2012 22:06:59 guido wrote: > > > > Nothing obvious there. Are you sure it was using heavy CPU at the time? > > > > > > It's always using this much CPU, including at that time. I checked. (With > > > top)> > > > > If so it might be a garbage collection issue > > > > > > > >.... how much memory is Freenet allowed in wrapper.conf? > > > > > > wrapper.java.maxmemory is set to 1095. I can find no other setting related > > > to memory limits in there. > > > > > > Here's the entire file: > > > > > > wrapper.java.command=java > > > wrapper.working.dir=../ > > > wrapper.java.mainclass=freenet.node.NodeStarter > > > wrapper.java.classpath.1=freenet.jar > > > wrapper.java.classpath.2=freenet-ext.jar > > > wrapper.java.library.path.1=lib > > > wrapper.java.initmemory=60 > > > # Increased because of slot filters in 1385 > > > wrapper.java.maxmemory=1095 > > > wrapper.java.additional.1=-Dnetworkaddress.cache.ttl=0 > > > wrapper.java.additional.2=-Dnetworkaddress.cache.negative.ttl=0 > > > wrapper.java.additional.3=-enableassertions:freenet > > > > Okay, add this line here: > > > > wrapper.java.additional.4=-Xloggc:freenet.loggc > > > > Then shut down and start up Freenet, and watch freenet.loggc. Are you seeing > > a lot of "Full GC" ? > > How much is a lot? After ~30 minutes of uptime, I get this: > > $ grep Full freenet.loggc > 173.713: [Full GC 59569K->30609K(66752K), 0.1119400 secs] > 194.924: [Full GC 42692K->42510K(84224K), 0.1144190 secs] > 224.924: [Full GC 66661K->66538K(116160K), 0.0961980 secs] > 233.162: [Full GC 78622K->76056K(129216K), 0.1531610 secs] > 276.978: [Full GC 110170K->101941K(193472K), 0.1233060 secs] > 300.933: [Full GC 147726K->111491K(230784K), 0.1306090 secs] > 327.116: [Full GC 160279K->130951K(279360K), 0.1293510 secs] > 355.853: [Full GC 172159K->124036K(306432K), 0.1917980 secs] > 380.778: [Full GC 159951K->137945K(351552K), 0.1342150 secs] > 815.527: [Full GC 186389K->126615K(232320K), 0.1548210 secs] > 927.181: [Full GC 165409K->116784K(307136K), 0.1476340 secs]
Well each one lasts less than a seconf and they are happening much less than once per second. So no, that's not a lot. => It's not a garbage collection issue. I guess you could get a few more stack dumps and send me them? Make sure that it's using loads of CPU at the time.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
