>> ...and once again one of the recent change broke my node... *sigh* >> build 11507 >>
>You realize you are running "unstable(testing)" builds of alpha >software, right? If you aren't doing it to test the software, I >suggest you stick to the "stable" releases. If you are reporting a >bug, could you choose a nicer tone please? >Thanks :) wow, juiceman. i meant no offense or harm to anyone! i know it's alpha as i've been around since version 0.3, ran 0.7 builds <300 and participated in the 0.7 testnet. what i mention here is that in the last few weeks there have been commits to HEAD that effectively stop a node from functioning. of course this can happen, but i'd like to see more testing before committing, and if the tests ran through okay (which i assume they did) a relatively quick response to the developers indicating a problem (my mail). as i assume this is a configuration or settings problem at my side, i haven't submitted a bug to emu. if it turns out to be one, i'll add one there. so, again, no offense meant! sorry, you thought so :( merry christmas :) ERsT0r! :P
