On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 10:45:01PM -0000, Anonymous via Panta Rhei wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Anonymous Remailer (austria) > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > first you have the damned thing spending forever farking with the > > > > > store on > > > > > startup, then you fark with the store so that it isn't going to grow > > > > > like > > > > > it should, now the farking thing starts up and pukes all over itself.
Both of those problems are fixed now. The store will use exactly half of the storeSize, at most, and the cache likewise, and the node will not need to resize either of them on startup, in general. There is a one-time migration from 994 to 996, however that is quick, and once it's done, 996 loads significantly faster than 994, and uses less memory. > > > > > logfile showed it was opening CHK store database when it happened. I > > > > > tried > > > > > everything, the only thing that fixed was to delete entire store. > > > > > only then > > > > > would it start up. > > > > > > > > If you had included your wrapper.log (maybe via a pastebin, e.g. > > > > code.bulix.org), I might have been able to help. > > > > > > What's a "wrapper"? > > > > > > File not found: wrapper.log > > > File not found: wrapper.* > > > File not found: wrapper* > > > > How did you install the node then? > > Like this: > > Message-ID: <E1GGYC3-0001pG-00 at smtp08.web.de> > > > > 0) be sure you have Java version 1.5 or 1.6 (1.4 will/should work too) > > - type "java -version" in a console and watch the output > > > > 1) download these two files into a separate directory you've created > > forehand: > > - http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/freenet-r10260-snapshot.jar > > - http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/freenet-ext.jar > > > > 2) change to the directory they're in > > > > 3) rename "freenet-r10260-snapshot.jar" to "freenet.jar" > > > > 4) run "java -cp freenet.jar;freenet-ext.jar;%CLASSPATH%;. freenet.node.Node > > > > 5) report problems :) > > 6) update freenet.jar as needed > > > Do you have any other log of the node's output? > > not that i can find. Okay, in future, if you continue to use freenet, please could you capture stderr/stdout to a log file? java -cp freenet.jar;freenet-ext.jar;%CLASSPATH%;. freenet.node.Node > log.output 2>&1 & Or something like that. Thanks. > > > > > > > in any freenet 0.7 directory or sub-directory > > > > > > > > also, why cant 0.7 have more than a few peers connected? > > > > > > > > It can. I have currently: > > > > * Connected: 11 > > > > * Backed off: 2 > > > > * Disconnected: 44 > > > > * Never Connected: 1 > > > > > > > > Often that's closer to 16. > > > > > > > > > * Connected: 4 > > > * Backed off: 1 > > > * Disconnected: 37 > > > * Never Connected: 31 > > > > > > and yes, they all have my ref. > > > > Maybe some of them dropped you? > > yeah, I hear 0.7 has a plague of that. Hmmm, somebody this morning said that 996 had significantly more peers connected for them (behind a double NAT). This is plausible as there were some USK fixes in 996... Does it help for you? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20061113/40fa89c5/attachment.pgp>
