On Wednesday 01 April 2009 23:27:53 Juiceman wrote: > 2009/4/1 Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org>: > > On Wednesday 01 April 2009 15:54:00 mihail at riseup.net wrote: > >> I went through it on the list and people said back, 'yeah, there are lots > >> of problems running Freenet on Vista but a new Vista friendly version is > >> coming soon'. > > > > Yes, it's a known problem, the easier solution is to use the start.exe and > > stop.exe from the new wininstaller in the old installer, the harder solution > > is to finish (e.g. translate) and deploy the new wininstaller. > > > I submitted several patches to make the current update.cmd script take > advantage of the new start.exe and stop.exe (if they existed) while > maintaining backwards compatibility, but that directory is restricted > access and no-one applied the patches. :( > > The last .diff I sent was on January 19th. I grew annoyed that my > work was seemingly not wanted and I wandered on to other things. > > I still had some work to do to finish the Vista node restart handling, > but I always committed working code that would not break installs and > in fact fixed at least one bug in the current script. > > Attached is the last .diff I sent if you want to see where I left off...
Sorry, I was busy with other things; this will be looked into before 0.8-alpha1. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090406/780d1433/attachment.pgp>
