Le Tue, 7 Apr 2009 15:36:48 -0400, Gerald A <geraldabli...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi Peter, > I can't answer all of your questions, but some I can: > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Peter Rasmussen <p...@udgaard.com> > wrote: > > > Too bad, but it raises some questions: > > > > 4.I have never understood why it should be possible to brick the > > Neo1973 for any reason, because if you have prepared at least one > > 'safe' entry point you should always be able to at least get to > > that. Or what is the problem? Shit happens ! I had bad luck and lost u-boot (the battery fall down at the bad moment ...). > Development doesn't require a debug board, but only a C compiler (or > something that emits the instructions that the Neo runs). Kernels, > flashing filesystems and system software doesn't have the same > problem, since you can simply re-flash them. Developing U-boot don't really need a debug board, but it's *far* easier to test it with a debug board. Just halt the cpu reload u-boot in memory and launch it. You don't have to wait. -- Frédéric Leroy _______________________________________________ support mailing list support@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support
