2009/6/1 Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <r...@sygehus.dk>: > Unfortunately, the U-Boot download link points to an ancient (>8 months > old) version of U-Boot. The latest U-Boot is here: > > http://downloads.openmoko.org/distro/experimental/NeoFreerunner/
ah, good you found it. i didn't realise that link was broken >> that said, i'm sticking with qi, and development there looks much more >> active. > > Not much difference: > > U-Boot: Two commits in the last two months. [1] > qi: Three commits in the last two months. [2] well, statistics can be deceptive. you're not wrong, but: u-boot 2 commits this year qi: 50+ commits this year of course, my stats could be deceptive too, and not tell the whole story. and they don't. this is more about predicting where qi will go in future, than where it is now. and various people from om have talked about qi being the way forward. i imagine there will be no more significant changes to uboot from here onwards, whereas qi will steadily improve. i might be wrong > [1] http://git.openmoko.org/?p=u-boot.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/stable > [2] http://git.openmoko.org/?p=qi.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master > >> there's no incentive i can see to stay with uboot > > Other than being able to flash a new boot loader. :-) eh? i'm happy with qi, my fr is working well (aside from wifi), and can update qi when i need to. i was careful all the way through what i said to include what 'i' am doing, rather than what you should do cheers _______________________________________________ support mailing list support@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support
