Rodolfo Vardelli ha scritto:

after more than 13 hour no interrupt storm, I can say that this rule solved the problem

regards

I have created a rule to block everything from LAN to LAN as first rule.
Tomorrow I'll make some more test

regards
Rodolfo




Perhaps block this rule on the LAN interface before the ALL all?

On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scott Ullrich ha scritto:

What was generating the traffic?



it was a normal broadcast to port 137-138 in network 9.0 that for some
strange reason pass to other network.

regards, Rodolfo


On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Scott Ullrich ha scritto:

I solved putting a blocking rule in lan to stop port 138.
No more interrupt storm as you can see from top:

last pid:  2266;  load averages:  0.15,  0.05,  0.04    up 0+00:29:37
18:33:12
22 processes:  1 running, 21 sleeping
CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.8% nice, 3.1% system, 0.4% interrupt, 95.7%
idle
Mem: 13M Active, 7492K Inact, 10M Wired, 24K Cache, 9824K Buf, 86M Free
Swap:

regards, Rodolfo




Any chance of doing a tcpdump and see if a packet appears to be stuck in a loop?

Scott


On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:




Scott Ullrich ha scritto:

In my opinion the bug is still here.
The light (that indicate traffics) of the NIC (wan1 and wan2), are still. And after I halt the secondary, and the webgui of primary is usuable,
the traffic of the interfaces (1 and 2)  is more than 100 Megabytes

regards
Rodolfo





There was a bug in previous versions that would send the machine into a interrupt storm due to a route bug. Your on a later version than
this so I really dont know what to say here.

Scott

On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:






Scott Ullrich ha scritto:

sorry, I meant outbound load balancing

regards
Rodolfo







On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:








Bill Marquette ha scritto:

standard soekris 4801 + 2 lan
traffic? in that moment zero

and it happens only with carp+load balance with two boards









When you say load balancing do you mean arp balancing?

Scott

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]













---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]











---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]














---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to